If you land on this blog, then probably you are already quite familiar with server-side tracking because you are not satisfied with stape or looking for something more feasible to handle.
Let me first tell you, probably you would have chosen Stape to ace server-side tracking, Iโm sure it quite did the job, but was making it tiring for your marketing team.
We personally donโt think of stape as our competitor, but I guess you do. So let me just jot down the difficulties or possibilities that you might have struggled with Stape and I can possibly help you with making your own decision according to your pain point or required use case.
Letโs roll. The following section is purely based on opinionated customer feedback on the online platforms.
Why One Might Look For Alternative to Stape?
Most common reasons businesses begin exploring alternatives to Stape (Yours might be listed down there, too):
1. Tracking Inconsistencies & Data Gaps
One of the most common frustrations among users is inconsistent data tracking. Their complaints were about mismatched conversions, events failing to reach ad platforms, and attribution looking slightly off.
2. High Technical Dependency (Not Truly Plug-and-Play)
While Stape manages infrastructure, it is still heavily dependent on GTM and developer support. Even small changes often require technical help, and without them the entire tracking setup would wreck.
3. Debugging & Preview Limitations
Users complain that Preview mode does not consistently show what actually fired, and validating whether events reached platforms like Meta or Google can be unclear, especially during live campaigns.
4. Risk of Duplicate or Unexpected Events
Duplicate conversions, double leads, or conflicting client-side and server-side events can creep in over time, creating reporting and optimization issues.
5. Steep Learning Curve When You Start Scaling
Stape works for basic setups, but as teams scale and need better event control, identity resolution, and multi-platform routing, it can start feeling more like infrastructure to manage than a growth system.
With that being said, Iโm super confident that you might be struggling with one of these. Now letโs drill down into the alternatives one by one.

What are 3 Stape Alternatives for Server-side Tracking?
If you really break down what makes server-side tracking good, itโs all about getting accurate, persistent, and privacy-resilient user signals from your site to the platforms that matter (Meta, Google, LinkedIn, etc.).
| Aspect | CustomerLabs (1PD Ops) | TAGGRS | Tracklution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Tracking Model | Server-side 1P domain tracking | Server-side GTM hosting | Fully managed server-side tracking |
| Cookie Strategy | First-party, lifetime cookies | GTM-based (config dependent) | Managed cookies (limited control) |
| Ease of Setup | Very easy (no-code) | Moderate (requires GTM knowledge) | Very easy (no-code) |
| Technical Dependency | Low | Medium | Low |
| GTM Dependency | Not required | Required | Not required |
| Event Firing Reliability | High (server-validated events) | Depends on GTM setup | High (managed pipeline) |
| Debugging Experience | Built-in, marketer-friendly visibility | GTM preview & logs | Platform dashboard |
| Risk of Duplicate Events | Low (built-in deduplication) | Medium (manual handling) | Low |
| Identity Resolution | Advanced (unified first-party profiles) | Limited / GTM-dependent | Basic |
| Consent Management | Built-in, privacy-first | Available via GTM configs | Limited |
| Audience Segmentation | Yes (first-party audiences) | No | No |
| Audience Activation | Yes (Meta, Google, LinkedIn, etc.) | No | No |
| Custom Reporting | Yes (on first-party data) | Limited | Basic |
| Can Replace Tracking + CDP | Yes | No | No |
| Best Suited For | Businesses wanting tracking โ activation โ reporting in one system | Technical teams / agencies | Teams wanting simple, hands-off tracking |
| Scalability (Business View) | High (consolidated stack) | Medium (infra-heavy) | Medium (limited flexibility) |
| Price Range | Starts from $99 (varies based on usage) | Free โ โฌ127+/month | โฌ39+/month+ |
| Free Trial | Yes (14-day) | Yes | Yes (14-day) |

CustomerLabs 1PD Ops – Topping the list
CustomerLabsโ approach to server-side 1P domain tracking becomes a differentiator. And hereโs what you actually get:
First-Party Cookies for unbreakable tracking
Traditional client-side tracking relies on third-party cookies and as weโve seen, browsers like Safari or Firefox will wipe these after a few days or block them entirely. With server-side 1P domain cookies (by the way it is a lifetime cookie), the tracking cookie is set from your own domain, letting you:
- retain user identifiers longer (not just 7 days)
- track a visitorโs entire journey even if they return after a week or even months
- attribute a purchase back to the original ad click, not as a โdirectโ visit
This dramatically improves conversion accuracy and campaign ROI.
Now, having lifetime first-party cookies is great.
But letโs be honest, cookies alone donโt fix tracking. What really decides whether server-side tracking works day to day is:
- how events are fired
- how reliably they reach ad platforms
- and how easily you can debug things when something goes wrong
This is where most Stape-style setups start becoming painful.
Clear Event Visibility
Every event starting from page view, add to cart, checkout, purchase, lead is tracked server-side and shown clearly inside CustomerLabs.
You can see which event fired, when it fired, what user data was attached and to which platform it was sent to (Meta, Google, LinkedIn, etc.)
So when someone asks, โDid Purchase fire properly?โ You donโt have to say โI think so.โ You can actually verify it.
Next comes, how many times would it fire, double triggers, duplicated events. Letโs see how CustomerLabs fixes that.
Built-In Deduplication (Without Manual Hacks)
CustomerLabs handles deduplication cleanly by:
- controlling both client and server signals
- using consistent event IDs
- ensuring platforms donโt count the same conversion twice
So you donโt have to manually stitch together client-side and server-side logic or worry about double reporting breaking your ROAS.
Moving on, if you are used to server GTM setups, you know how debugging usually goes. You will have to open preview, refresh, hope the event shows, wonder if it reached ad platforms..
Debugging Without GTMย
But with CustomerLabs you can simply skip all that.
You donโt need server GTM preview mode, browser extensions or even developer intervention
You can debug tracking directly from the platform, which makes fixing issues faster and far less stressful for marketing teams.
Lastly but a basic need of a tool is to safely track the events and deliver it to the ad platforms without data loss.
Cleaner Signals for Ad Platforms
One of the biggest advantages of CustomerLabsโ server-side tracking setup is the quality of signals it sends to ad platforms. Instead of relying on fragile browser-based signals, CustomerLabs sends structured, validated events that platforms can trust.
Over time, this has a direct impact on campaign performance. Better signals help ad platforms optimize more effectively, train their algorithms faster, and make smarter delivery decisions As a result, attribution becomes clearer and less prone to gaps.
But the tools’ capabilities do not end here. I have spoken about it in the end.

TAGGRS
If you ask me, TAGGRS is probably the closest alternative to Stape in terms of how it fundamentally works. (I mean more like cousins, different only in certain aspects)
At its core, TAGGRS is a server-side Google Tag Manager hosting platform. Instead of you setting up and managing server infrastructure on Google Cloud or elsewhere, TAGGRS hosts the server container for you and takes care of the infrastructure side of things.
This immediately removes one pain point, you donโt have to deal with cloud setup, billing projects, or server maintenance. That part is handled.
However, once the server container is live, everything else still happens inside server-side GTM.
From a server-side tracking point of view, you continue to:
- configure tags, triggers, and variables inside a server GTM container
- manage how events are received, transformed, and forwarded
- debug issues using GTM preview mode and logs
So while the infrastructure is managed, the tracking logic is still entirely GTM-driven.
So if youโre technically comfortable, or working with an agency that knows server-side GTM deeply, TAGGRS can work well.
For most in-house marketing teams, though, the dependency on GTM and technical knowledge doesnโt disappear; it just gets hosted somewhere else.
Tracklution
Tracklution takes a very different approach compared to Stape or TAGGRS.
Tracklution offers a fully managed server-side tracking pipeline. Thereโs no GTM container to configure, no servers to set up, and no infrastructure decisions to make.
Primarily, Tracklution focuses on one core goal; making sure conversion events reach ad platforms reliably.
The setup is quick and largely no-code. You connect your site, configure the key events you want to track, and Tracklution handles the rest in the background. Events are captured server-side and forwarded to platforms like Meta and Google without requiring technical intervention.
This approach removes a lot of friction for marketing teams. Thereโs very little that can break, and very little that needs ongoing maintenance. For businesses that donโt want to deal with GTM, debugging, or server logic at all, this simplicity is a big advantage.
However, one thing that you should ideally do when it comes to Taggrs is that since the tracking is fully managed, you donโt get deep control over event logic, identity resolution, or custom routing.
You rely on Tracklutionโs predefined workflows and pipelines. This is perfectly fine if your requirement is straightforward; track conversions, send them server-side, and keep things running.
But as you scale and start needing more nuanced control such as custom event enrichment, advanced identity stitching, or multi-platform routing logic. Tracklution can start to feel limiting.
In short, Tracklution works best when you want server-side tracking without thinking about server-side tracking. Itโs clean, simple, and reliable as long as your needs stay simple too.
Thatโs it. Hereโs what Iโd pick
My Honest Opinion (As a Marketer)
If your only requirement is โI just want server-side tracking running,โ all three can technically do the job.
But honestly, Iโd go with CustomerLabs, not just because it does server-side tracking well, but because it covers everything a business actually needs to get better results from its marketing infrastructure.
Once you move beyond basic tracking, you quickly realise youโll need more than just events firing correctly. You need identity resolution, audience segmentation, consent management, activation across ad platforms, and usually a third-party tool or CDP to stitch all of this together.
And thatโs where the problem starts.
Given the growing privacy restrictions, browser limitations, and stricter data regulations, adding more tools to the stack isnโt a wise business decision. Every additional tool means more integrations, more points of failure, higher maintenance costs, and greater dependency on technical teams to keep everything running.
CustomerLabs solves this by bringing tracking, identity resolution, audience building, audience activation, and reporting into a single system. Instead of stitching together separate tools for tracking and CDP-like functionality, you can effectively replace both with one platform.
It’s not like having more tools is wrong, where you can basically integrate as many numbers of destinations and sources to bring in data and send data back to ad platforms with simple toggle on setups.
Alongside, real-time consent management, privacy compliant data practices with GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, etc
Youโre not just collecting data, youโre unifying it, activating it, and using it to drive growth, all in a privacy-safe and future-ready way.
From a business point of view, fewer tools, cleaner data, and tighter control almost always win. And thatโs why CustomerLabs makes the most sense to me.
If you want to get hands-on experience, to get on a free trial period or talk to an expert inside CustomerLabs.